4.5 Article

Autoradiographic mapping of 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors in the post mortem human brain using [3H]GR 125743

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 915, Issue 1, Pages 47-57

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02823-2

Keywords

[H-3]GR 125743; 5-HT1B receptor; 5-HT1D receptor; human brains; whole hemisphere autoradiography

Categories

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH 44814] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The distribution of 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors in the human post mortem brain was examined using whole hemisphere autoradiography and the radioligand [H-3]GR 125743. [H-3]GR 125743 binding was highest in the substantia nigra and the globus pallidus. Lower levels were detected in the striatum, with the highest densities in the ventromedial parts. In the amygdala, the hippocampus, the septal region and the hypothalamus, lower [H-3]GR 125743 binding was observed. reflecting low densities of 5-HT1B/1D receptors. In the cerebral cortex, binding was similar in most regions, although restricted parts of the medial occipital cortex were markedly more densely labeled. Binding densities were very low in the cerebellar cortex and in the thalamus. Two methods were used to distinguish between the two receptor subtypes, the first using ketanserin to block 5-HT1D receptors and the second using SB 224289 to inhibit 5-HT1B receptor binding. The autoradiograms indicated that in the human brain, the 5-HT1B receptor is much more abundant than the 5-HT1D receptor, which seemed to occur only in low amounts mainly in the ventral pallidum. Although [H-3]GR 125743 is a suitable radioligand to examine the distribution of 5-HT1B receptors in the human brain in vitro, the selectivities of ketanserin and SB 224289 are not sufficiently high to give definite evidence for the occurrence of the 5-HT1D receptor in the human brain. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science BY All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available