4.7 Article

Localization of Fe2+ at an RTGR sequence within a DNA duplex explains preferential cleavage by Fe2+ and H2O2

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 312, Issue 5, Pages 1089-1101

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5010

Keywords

Fenton reaction; DNA nicking; Fe2+ localization; H-1 NMR; paramagnetic signal broadening

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30ES01896] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM43129, R01GM19020] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nicking of duplex DNA by the iron-mediated Fenton reaction occurs preferentially at a limited number of sequences. Of these, purine-T-G-purine (RTGR) is of particular interest because it is a required element in the upstream regulatory regions of many genes involved in iron and oxidative-stress responses. In order to study the basis of this preferential nicking, NMR studies were undertaken on the RTGR-containing duplex oligonucleotide, d(CGCGATATGACACTAG)/d(CTAGTGTCATATCGCG). One-dimensional and two-dimensional H-1 NMR measurements show that Fe2+ interacts preferentially and reversibly at the ATGA site within the duplex at a rate that is rapid relative to the chemical-shift timescale, while selective paramagnetic NMR line-broadening of the T ATGA guanine H8 suggests that Fe2+ interacts with the guanine N7 moiety. Localization at this site is supported by Fe2+ titrations of a duplex containing a 7-deazaguanine substitution in place of the guanine in the ATGA sequence. The addition of a 100-fold excess of Mg2+ over Fe2+ does not affect the Fe2+-dependent broadening. When the ATGA site in the duplex is replaced by ATGT, an RTGR site (GTGA) is created on the opposite strand. Preferential iron localization then takes place at the 3' guanine in GTGA but no longer at the guanine in ATGT, consistent with the lack of preferential cleavage of ATGT sites relative to ATGA sites. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available