Journal
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 323, Issue 7316, Pages 776-780BPublisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7316.776
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of progesterone and progestogens in the management of premenstrual syndrome. Design Systematic review of published randomised, placebo controlled trials. Studies reviewed 10 trials of progesterone therapy (531 women) and four trials of progestogen therapy (378 women). Main outcome measures Proportion of Women Whose symptoms showed improvement with progesterone preparations (suppositories and oral micronised). Proportion of women whose symptoms showed improvement with progestogens. Secondary analysis of efficacy of progesterone and progestogens in managing physical and behavioural symptoms. Results Overall standardised mean difference for all trials that assessed efficacy of progesterone (by both routes of administration) was -0.028 (95% confidence interval -0.017 to -0.040). The odds ratio was 1.05 (1.03 to 1.08) in favour of progesterone, indicating no clinically important difference between progesterone and placebo. For progestogens the overall standardised mean was -0.036 (-0.059 to -0.014), which corresponds to an odds ratio of 1.07 (1.03 to 1.11) showing a statistically, but not clinically, significant improvement for women taking progestogens. Conclusion The evidence from these metes-analyses does not support the use of progesterone or progestogens in the management of premenstrual syndrome.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available