4.7 Article

Reynolds-number dependence of turbulent velocity and pressure increments

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 444, Issue -, Pages 343-382

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022112001005511

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main focus is the Reynolds number dependence of Kolmogorov normalized low-order moments of longitudinal and transverse velocity increments. The velocity increments are obtained in a large number of flows and over a wide range (40-4250) of the Taylor microscale Reynolds number R-lambda. The R-lambda dependence is examined for values of the separation, r, in the dissipative range, inertial range and in excess of the integral length scale. In each range, the Kolmogorov-normalized moments of longitudinal and transverse velocity increments increase with R-lambda. The scaling exponents of both longitudinal and transverse velocity increments increase with R-lambda, the increase being more significant for the latter than the former. As R-lambda increases, the inequality between scaling exponents of longitudinal and transverse velocity increments diminishes, reflecting a reduced influence from the large-scale anisotropy or the mean shear on inertial range scales. At sufficiently large R-lambda, inertial range exponents for the second-order moment of the pressure increment follow more closely those for the fourth-order moments of transverse velocity increments than the fourth-order moments of longitudinal velocity increments. Comparison with DNS data indicates that the magnitude and R-lambda dependence of the mean square pressure gradient, based on the joint-Gaussian approximation, is incorrect. The validity of this approximation improves as r increases; when r exceeds the integral length scale, the R-lambda dependence of the second-order pressure structure functions is in reasonable agreement with the result originally given by Batchelor (1951).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available