4.5 Article

Localization of the presynaptic cytomatrix protein piccolo at ribbon and conventional synapses in the rat retina:: Comparison with bassoon

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
Volume 439, Issue 2, Pages 224-234

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.1344

Keywords

synaptic proteins; glutamatergic; GABAergic and glycinergic synapses; immunocytochemistry; postembedding immunoelectron microscopy

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P01 AG06569] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS39471] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years significant progress has been made in the elucidation of the molecular assembly of the postsynaptic density at synapses, whereas little is known as yet about the components of the presynaptic active zone. Piccolo and Bassoon, two structurally related presynaptic cytomatrix proteins, are highly concentrated at the active zones of both excitatory and inhibitory synapses in rat brain. In this study we used immunocytochemistry to examine the cellular and ultrastructural localization of Piccolo at synapses in the rat retina and compared it with that of Bassoon. Both proteins showed strong punctate immunofluorescence in the outer and the inner plexiform layers of the retina. They were found presynaptically at glutamatergic ribbon synapses and at conventional GABAergic and glycinergic synapses. Although the two proteins were coexpressed at all photoreceptor ribbon synapses and at some conventional amacrine cell synapses, at bipolar cell ribbon synapses only Piccolo was present. Our data demonstrate similarities but also differences in the molecular composition of the presynaptic apparatuses of the synapses in the retina, differences that may account for the functional differences observed between the ribbon and the conventional amacrine cell synapses and between the photoreceptor and the bipolar cell ribbon synapses in the retina. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available