4.7 Article

A comparative evaluation of conventional and pretargeted radioimmunotherapy of CD20-expressing lymphoma xenografts

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 98, Issue 8, Pages 2535-2543

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.V98.8.2535

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [K23 CA78346, R01 CA76287] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radioimmunotherapy with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies is a promising new treatment approach for patients with relapsed B-cell lymphomas. However, the majority of patients treated with conventional radiolabeled anti-CD20 antibodies eventually have a relapse because the low tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-normal organ ratios of absorbed radioactivity limit the dose that can be safely administered without hematopoietic stem cell support. This study assessed the ability of a streptavidin-biotin pretargeting approach to improve the biodistribution of radioactivity in mice bearing Ramos lymphoma xenografts. A pretargeted streptavidin-conjugated anti-CD20 1F5 antibody was infused, followed 24 hours later by a biotinylated N-acetylgalactosamine-containing clearing agent and finally 3 hours later by In-11-labeled DOTA-biotin. Tumor-to-blood ratios were 3:1 or more with pretargeting, compared with 0.5:1 or less with conventional In-111-1F5. Tumor-to-normal organ ratios of absorbed radioactivity up to 56:1 were observed with pretargeting, but were 6:1 or less with conventional In-111-1F5. Therapy experiments demonstrated that 400 mu Ci (14.8 MBq) or more of conventional Y-90-1F5 was required to obtain major tumor responses, but this dose was associated with lethal toxicity in 100% of mice. In marked contrast, up to 800 mu Ci (29.6 MBq) Y-90-DOTA-biotin could be safely administered by the pretargeting approach with only minor toxicity, and 89% of the mice were cured. These data suggest that anti-CD20 pretargeting shows great promise for improving current therapeutic options for B-cell lymphomas and warrants further preclinical and clinical testing. (Blood:2001;98:2535-2543) (C) 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available