4.7 Review

Gene delivery with synthetic (non viral) carriers

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 229, Issue 1-2, Pages 1-21

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5173(01)00861-4

Keywords

non-viral gene delivery; polymers; cationic liposomes; polymeric vesicles; dendrimers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-viral gene delivery involving the use of cationic polymer and cationic lipid based carriers still continues to enjoy a high profile due to the safety advantages offered by these systems when compared with viruses. However, there are still problems associated with the use of these agents, notably their comparatively low efficiency and the inability to target gene expression to the area of pathology. On intravenous administration gene expression is found predominantly in the first capillary bed encountered-the lung endothelium. The clinical use of non-viral gene delivery systems in cystic fibrosis or cancer has involved their direct application to the site of pathology due to the targeting difficulties experienced. For gene expression to occur genes must be transported to the interior of the cell nucleus and a number of biological barriers to effective gene delivery have been identified. These may be divided into extracellular such as the targeting barrier mentioned above and intracellular such as the need for endosomal escape after endocytosis and the inefficient trafficking of genes to the nucleus. Targeting ligands. have been used with moderate success to overcome the targeting barrier while endosomal escape and nuclear targeting peptides are some of the strategies, which have been employed to overcome the problems of endosomal escape and nuclear trafficking, It is hoped that the next generation of carriers will incorporate mechanisms to overcome these barriers thus improving the efficacy of such materials. (C) 2001 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available