4.7 Article

Expression of nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase, and p53 in different stages of human gastric cancer

Journal

CANCER LETTERS
Volume 172, Issue 2, Pages 177-185

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3835(01)00645-0

Keywords

gastric cancer; nitric oxide; cyclooxygenase; p53

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study evaluated the significance of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), cyclooxygenase (COX) expression and p53 status in 55 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and relationship of these molecular markers to tumor characteristics and metastatic potential, Immunohistochemical technique was used to identify the cellular location and distribution of the enzymes in the specific cells of gastric tumors. In gastric cancer tissue, the expression of inducible enzymes, iNOS and COX-2, increased significantly with increasing tumor stage (P = 0.015, P = 0.001, respectively), size (P = 0.025, P = 0.001, respectively) and the presence of metastases (P = 0.002, P = 0.015, respectively). The expression of constitutive enzymes, ecNOS and COX-1, followed the opposite pattern. COX-1 was significantly reduced in advanced gastric tumors (P = 0.007) and tumors larger than 5 cm (P = 0.007). Reduced expression of ecNOS was also observed in advanced gastric tumors; however, this did not reach statistical significance. 53% of gastric tumors showed accumulation of p53. This was significantly higher in advanced tumors (P = 0.004), larger than 5 cm (P = 0.015) with metastases (P < 0.001). Gastric tumors positive for accumulation of p53 had significantly stronger expression of iNOS (P = 0.018) and COX-2 (P = 0.01) enzymes than tumors negative for this nucleophosphoprotein. We conclude, that tumor-associated nitric oxide production, as well as COX-2 overexpression, may promote gastric cancer progression by providing a selective growth advantage to tumor cells with non-functioning p53. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available