4.6 Article

Patterns of living β-actin movement in wounded human coronary artery endothelial cells exposed to shear stress

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
Volume 270, Issue 2, Pages 223-234

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1006/excr.2001.5351

Keywords

vasculature; biomechanics; intimal healing; beta-actin; endothelium

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM59931] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We previously demonstrated that physiologic levels of shear stress enhance endothelial repair. Cell spreading and migration, but not proliferation, were the major mechanisms accounting for the increases in wound closure rate (Albuquerque et al., 2000, Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 279, H293-H302). However, the patterns and movements of beta -actin filaments responsible for cell motility and translocation in human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs) have not been previously investigated under physiologic flow. HCAECs transfected with beta -actin-GFP were cultured on type I collagen-coated coverslips. Confluent cell monolayers were subjected to laminar shear stress of 12 dynes/cm(2) for 18 h in a parallel-plate flow chamber to attain cellular alignment and then wounded by scraping with a metal spatula and subsequently exposed to a laminar shear stress of 20 dynes/cm(2) (S-W-sH) or static (S-W-sT) conditions. Time-lapse imaging and deconvolution microscopy was performed during the first 3 h after imposition of S-W-sH or S-W-sT conditions. The spatial and temporal dynamics of beta -actin-GFP motility and translocation during wound closure in HCAEC monolayers were analyzed under both conditions. Compared with HCAEC under S-W-sT conditions, our data show that HCAEC under S-W-sH conditions demonstrated greater beta -actin-GFP motility, filament and clumping patterns, and filament arcs used during cellular attachment and detachment. These findings demonstrate intriguing patterns of beta -actin organization and movement during wound closure in HCAEC exposed to physiological flow. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available