4.5 Article

Stepwise logistic regression analysis of tumor contour features for breast ultrasound diagnosis

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages 1493-1498

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-5629(01)00466-5

Keywords

breast cancer; computer-aided diagnosis (CAD); ultrasound

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To assist the ultrasound (US) differential diagnosis of solid breast tumors by using stepwise logistic regression (SLR) analysis of tumor contour features, we retrospectively reviewed 111 medical records of digitized US images of breast pathologies. They were pathologically proved benign breast tumors from 40 patients (i.e., 40 fibroadenomas) and malignant breast tumors from 71 patients (i.e., 71 infiltrative ductal carcinomas). Radiologists, before analysis by the computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system, segmented the tumors manually. The contour features were calculated by measuring the radial length of tumor boundaries. The features selection process was accomplished using a stepwise analysis procedure. Then, an SLR model with contour features was used to classify tumors as benign or malignant. In this experiment, cases were sampled with leave-one-out test methods to evaluate the SLR performance using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The accuracy of our SLR model with contour features for classifying malignancies was 91.0% (101 of 111 tumors), the sensitivity was 97.2% (69 of 71), the specificity was 80.0% (32 of 40), the positive predictive value was 89.6% (69 of 77), and the negative predictive value was 94.1% (32 of 34). The CAD system using SLR can differentiate solid breast nodules with relatively high accuracy and its high negative predictive value could potentially help inexperienced operators to avoid misdiagnoses. Because the SLR model is trainable, it could be optimized if a larger set of tumor images were supplied. (C) 2001 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available