4.6 Article

High and intermediate-resolution spectroscopy of Be stars -: An atlas of Hγ HeI 4471 and MgII 4481 lines

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 378, Issue 3, Pages 861-882

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011202

Keywords

stars : emission-line, Be; stars : fundamental parameters; techniques : spectroscopic; line : profiles

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an atlas of H gamma, He I lambda 4471 and Mg II lambda 4481 line profiles obtained in a 10 year observation period of 116 Be stars, which enabled many of them to be observed at quite different emission epochs. From the best fit of the observed He I lambda 4471 line profiles with non-LTE, uniform (T-eff; log g) and full limb-darkened model line profiles, we determined the V sin i of the program stars. To account, to some degree, for the line formation peculiarities related to the rapid rotation-induced non-uniform distributions of temperature and gravity on the stellar surface, the fit was achieved by considering (T-eff; log g) as free parameters. This method produced V sin i estimations that correlate with the rotational velocities determined by Slettebak (1982) within a dispersion sigma less than or equal to 30 km s(-1) and without any systematic deviation. They can be considered as given in the new Slettebak's et al. (1975) system. Only 13 program stars have discrepant V sin i values. In some objects, this discrepancy could be attributed to binary effects. Using the newly determined V sin i parameters, we found that the ratio of true rotational velocities V/V-c of the program Be stars has a very low dispersion around the mean value. Assuming then that all the stars are rigid rotators with the same ratio V (<(omega)over bar>)/V-c, we looked for the value of <(omega)over bar> that better represents the distribution of V sin i/V-c for randomly oriented rotational axes. We obtained <(omega)over bar> = 0.795. This value enabled us to determine the probable inclination angle of the stellar rotation axis of the program stars. In the observed line profiles of H gamma, He I lambda 4471, Mg II lambda 4481 and Fe II lambda 4351 we measured several parameters related to the absorption and/or emission components, such as: equivalent width, residual emission and/or absorption intensity, FWHM, emission peak separations, etc. The parameters related to the H gamma line emission profiles were used to investigate the structure of the nearby environment of the central star. From the characteristics of the correlations between these quantities and the inferred inclination angle, we concluded that in most of cases the H gamma line emission forming regions may not be strongly flattened. Using a simple representation of the radiation flux emitted by the star+envelope system, we derived first order estimates of physical parameters characterizing the H gamma line emission formation region. Thus, we obtained that the total extent of the H gamma region is R-f similar or equal to 2.5 +/- 1.0 R-* and that the density distribution in these layers can be mimicked with a power law rho similar to R-alpha, where alpha = 2.5(-0.6)(+2.2). The same approach enabled us to estimate the optical depth of the H gamma line emission formation region. From its dependence with the aspect angle, we concluded that these regions are caracterized by a modest flattening and that the rho (equator)/rho (pole) density contrast of the circumstellar envelope near the star should be two orders of magnitude lower than predicted by models based on a priori disc-shaped circumstellar envelopes. We found that the separation between the emission peaks, Delta (p), and the full width at half maximum, Delta (1/2), of the H gamma line emission are not only sensitive to kinematic effects, but to line optical depth as well. This finding agrees with previous theoretical predictions and confirms that Huang's (1972) relation overestimates the extent of the H gamma line emission formation region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available