4.6 Article

Serum S100B protein levels are correlated with subclinical, neurocognitive declines after carotid endarterectomy

Journal

NEUROSURGERY
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages 1076-1082

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200111000-00010

Keywords

carotid endarterectomy; cerebral ischemia; neuron-specific enolase; neuropsychological tests; S100B

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 NS002038] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS40409, K08 NS002038-02, NS2038, R01 NS040409] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an effective means of stroke prevention among appropriately selected patients; however, neuropsychometric testing has revealed subtle cognitive injuries in the early postoperative period. The purpose of this study was to establish whether serum levels of two biochemical markers of cerebral injury were correlated with postoperative declines in neuropsychometric test performance after CEA. METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive patients underwent a battery of neuropsychometric tests 24 hours before and 24 hours after elective CEA. Two patients were excluded because of postoperative strokes. The pre- and postoperative serum levels of S100B protein and neuron-specific enolase for injured patients, defined as those who exhibited significant declines in neuropsychometric test performance (n = 12), were compared with the levels for uninjured patients (n = 41). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the baseline S100B levels for the two groups. Injured patients exhibited significantly higher S100B levels, compared with uninjured patients, at 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in neuron-specific enolase levels for injured and uninjured patients at any time point. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that subtle cerebral injuries after CEA, even in the absence of overt strokes, are associated with significant increases in serum S100B but not neuron-specific enolase levels. Analyses of earlier time points in future studies of subtle cognitive injuries and biochemical markers of cerebral injury after CEA may be revealing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available