4.5 Article

Molecular enhancement of porcine cardiac chronotropy

Journal

HEART
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages 559-562

Publisher

BRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/heart.86.5.559

Keywords

sinus node; adrenergic receptor; chronotropic agents; conduction system; gene therapy

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL41484, HLS9316] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective-To test the potential of gene transfer approaches to enhance cardiac chronotropy in a porcine system as a model of the human heart. Methods-Plasmids encoding either the human beta (2) adrenergic receptor or control constructs were injected into the right atria of native Yorkshire pig hearts. Percutaneous electrophysiological recording catheters equipped with 33 gauge circular injection needles were positioned in the mid-lateral right atrium. At the site of the earliest atrial potential the circular injection needles were rotated into the myocardium and the beta (2) adrenergic receptor (n = 6) or control plasmid constructs (n = 5) were injected. Results-Injection of the beta (2) adrenergic receptor construct significantly enhanced chronotropy compared with control injections. The average (SD) heart rate of the pigs was 108 (16) beats/min before injection. Two days after injection with control plasmids the heart rate was 127 (25) beats/min (NS compared with preinjection rates). After injection with plasmid encoding the beta (2) adrenergic receptor the heart rate increased by 50% to 163 (33) beats/min (p < 0.05 compared with preinjection and postinjection control rates). Conclusions-The present studies showed in a large animal model that local targeting of gene expression may be a feasible modality to regulate cardiac pacemaking activity. In addition, these investigations provide an experimental basis for developing future clinical gene transfer approaches to upregulate heart rate and modulate cardiac conduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available