4.7 Article

The SCUBA Local Universe Galaxy Survey -: II.: 450-μm data:: evidence for cold dust in bright IRAS galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 327, Issue 3, Pages 697-714

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04789.x

Keywords

surveys; dust, extinction; galaxies : ISM; infrared : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This is the second in a series of papers presenting results from the SCUBA Local Universe Galaxy Survey. In our first paper we provided 850-mum flux densities for 104 galaxies selected from the IRAS Bright Galaxy Sample and we found that the 60-, 100-mum (IRAS) and 850-mum (SCUBA) fluxes could be adequately fitted by emission from dust at a single temperature. In this paper we present 450-mum data for the galaxies. With the new data, the spectral energy distributions of the galaxies can no longer be fitted with an isothermal dust model - two temperature components are now required. Using our 450-mum data and fluxes from the literature, we find that the 450/850-mum flux ratio for the galaxies is remarkably constant, and this holds from objects in which the star formation rate is similar to our own Galaxy, to ultraluminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) such as Arp 220. The only possible explanation for this is if the dust emissivity index for all of the galaxies is similar to2 and the cold dust component has a similar temperature in all galaxies (T-c similar to 20-21 K). The 60-mum luminosities of the galaxies were found to depend on both the dust mass and the relative amount of energy in the warm component, with a tendency for the temperature effects to dominate at the highest L-60. The dust masses estimated using the new temperatures are higher by a factor of similar to2 than those determined previously using a single temperature. This brings the gas-to-dust ratios of the IRAS galaxies into agreement with those of the Milky Way and other spiral galaxies which have been intensively studied in the submm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available