4.6 Article

Visual binaries among high-mass stars -: An adaptive optics survey of OB stars in the NGC6611 cluster

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 379, Issue 1, Pages 147-161

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011305

Keywords

stars : binaries : visual; stars : formation; stars : early-type; Galaxy : open clusters and associations : individual : NGC 6611

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have searched for visual binaries with projected separations in the range 200-3000 AU (0.1-1.5) among a sample of 96 stars in the massive young NGC6611 cluster, 60 of them being subsequently identified as high probability cluster members of mainly OB spectral type. This is the first visual binary survey among such a large and homogeneous sample of high-mass stars. We find an uncorrected binary frequency of 18 +/- 6% over the surveyed separation range. Considering only binaries with mass ratios q greater than or equal to 0.1, we find that OB stars in NGC6611 host more companions than solar-type field stars. We derive mass ratios for the detected binaries from their near-infrared flux ratios and conclude that about half of the detected binaries have q less than or similar to 0.2, which does not contradict the assumption that companion masses are randomly drawn from the initial mass function. There is no evidence in our sample that wide-binary properties depend upon the mass of the primary star. The high frequency of massive binaries in a cluster as rich as NGC6611 and the lack of a strong mass dependence of their properties are difficult to reconcile with the scenario whereby massive stars form as the result of mergers of smaller stars. The canonical protostellar accretion scenario together with cloud fragmentation, on the other hand, can naturally explain most of the observed binary properties, although the very high stellar density in the protocluster is likely to require significant modification to that picture as well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available