4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Increased tumor necrosis factor-α production after lipopolysaccharide stimulation of whole blood in patients with previous preterm delivery complicated by intra-amniotic infection or inflammation

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 185, Issue 5, Pages 1064-1067

Publisher

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.117637

Keywords

preterm birth; tumor necrosis factor-alpha; cytokines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To compare cytokine production after lipopolysaccharide stimulation of whole blood from women who were delivered of infants at term compared with women who were delivered of preterm infants with intra-amniotic evidence of infection or inflammation. STUDY DESIGN: Whole blood samples from 12 women who were not pregnant and who had previously had preterm deliveries before 32 weeks complicated by intra-amniotic infection or inflammation and samples from 12 age- and race-matched control subjects were stimulated with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 levels were quantified at 6 hours and interleukin-10 at 24 hours by enzyme immunoassay. Results were compared with use of the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha production was significantly higher in whole blood from women with histories of a preterm birth and intra-amniotic infection or inflammation (11,243 +/- 1030 pg/mL [mean +/- SEM]) compared with control subjects (3649 +/- 349 pg/mL) at a lipopolysaccharide concentration of 1 mug/mL (P = .002). There were no significant differences in interleukin-6 or interleukin-10 production. CONCLUSION: Women with previous early preterm deliveries who had evidence of intra-amniotic infection or inflammation had significantly higher tumor necrosis factor-alpha production after lipopolysaccharide stimulation of whole blood compared with women with previous term deliveries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available