4.5 Article

Hypertension guidelines and their limitations -: the impact of physicians' compliance as evaluated by guideline awareness

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages 2079-2086

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200111000-00020

Keywords

hypertension; guidelines; survey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The initial step of an optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with arterial hypertension is the recognition and acceptance of new recommendations by the physicians themselves. This guideline awareness of the physicians has never been evaluated in detail. Design The awareness of content of current recommendations in hypertension diagnosis, treatment and treatment control was therefore assessed in primary care physicians using a questionnaire. The guidelines of the German Hypertension Society were used as the reference standard. Participants A total of 24 899 German physicians, including all internists, all cardiologists and 22% of general practitioners were contacted in a nationwide survey. Main outcome measures The number of answers in agreement with the guideline was used as a measure of guideline awareness. Adequate awareness of content of guideline recommendations was defined as the correct answer to five out of eight questions; the correct answers had to include the appropriate definition of hypertension. Results The analysis was based on 11 547 returned questionnaires (47.1%). An adequate guideline awareness was found in 23.7% of the total study population, especially in 37.1% of cardiologists, in 25.6% of internists and in 18.8% of general practitioners. While the guideline awareness was significantly influenced by the duration of private practice, regional and municipal factors had only minor influence on the results. Conclusion The impact of hypertension guidelines on actual medical knowledge is modest. Thus, the information strategies about current treatment guidelines must be improved and tailored to the needs of physicians in clinical practice to ultimately improve patient care. (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available