4.7 Article

Computerized neurocognitive scanning: I. Methodology and validation in healthy people

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 766-776

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00278-0

Keywords

neuropsychological testing; neurocognition; computerized assessment; sex differences; aging; psychometrics

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [MO1-RR0040] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH-43380, MH-01336, MH-53326, MH-42191] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuropsychological testing batteries are applied in neurobehavioral evaluations of brain disorders, including neuropsychiatric populations. They are lengthy, require expert administrators and professional scorers, and are prone to data handling errors. We describe a brief computerized neurocognitive scan that assesses similar domains with adequate reliability. The scan and a traditional battery were administered to a sample of 92 healthy individuals (44 men, 48 women) in a counterbalanced order. Both approaches Showed a significant sex-typical gradient, with women outperforming men in verbal memory relative to spatial tasks. Both methods also yielded similar profiles of sex differences, with the additional computerized measure of face memory showing better performance in Women. Age effects were evident for both methods, but the computerized scan isolated the effects to speed rather than accuracy. Therefore, the computerized scan has favorable reliability and construct validity and can be applied efficiently to study healthy variability related to age and gender. (C) 2001 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. Published by Elsevier Science Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available