4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Contribution of lymphatic drainage system in corneal allograft rejection in mice

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-001-0384-4

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To modulate aqueous outflow via the uveoscleral pathway and to determine its influence on corneal graft survival in mice. Methods: BALB/c mice received corneal transplants from C3H mice and were placed randomly in three treatment groups: saline, pilocarpine or latanoprost. Three further groups received adjuvant systemic and topical corticosteroids. The kinetics of infiltrating lymphocytes, neutrophils and macrophages in the transplants was investigated in an additional 96 animals. Cytokine expression in the submandibular lymph nodes and spleen was investigated using in-situ hybridization and RNAse protection assay. Tracer experiments were conducted using (TC)-T-99m colloidal albumin Nanocoll; count rates were determined in the submandibular lymph nodes, spleen and blood following both subconjunctival and intracameral injection. Results: Neither pilocarpine nor latanoprost had any influence on aqueous outflow or allograft survival in mice. Neutrophils and macrophages dominated the infiltrating cells I I days postoperative in both treated and untreated grafts. On postoperative day 13, a greater increase in lymphocytes than in other cell groups was observed in allogeneic grafts. Following allogeneic transplantation, 1% of lymphocytes in ipsilateral submandibular lymph nodes were positive for IFN-gamma. Tracer studies revealed a 16% aqueous outflow via the uveoscleral routes following intracameral injection of Nanocoll; this was increased by 97% with subconjunctival injection. Conclusion: Our data confirm the existence of functional lymphatic drainage via the uveoscleral pathway and conjunctiva in the mouse. Cells within the ipsilateral submandibular lymph node respond to stimuli upstream. This reaction could potentially be manipulated to improve graft survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available