4.8 Article

Determination of electrophoretic mobilities and hydrodynamic radii of three humic substances as a function of pH and ionic strength

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 21, Pages 4301-4306

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es010038r

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Capillary electrophoresis (CE) and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) were employed to determine electrophoretic mobilities and hydrodynamic sizes of three humic substances (IHSS aquatic fulvic acid (FA), IHSS aquatic humic acid (HA), and IHSS peat humic acid (PHA)) as a function of pH and ionic strength. A slight aggregation corresponding to the formation of dimers and trimers was observed at low pH using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS). For example, for the peat humic acid, diffusion coefficients decreased from 2.1 x 10(-10) M-2 s(-1) at pH 4 to 2.4 x 10(-10) M-2 s(-1) at pH 11. For all three humic substances, electrophoretic mobilities were also shown to decrease significantly below pH 6. Calculated zeta potentials observed at high pH of -69 mV (FA), -62 mV (HA), and -63 mV (PHA) decreased to -39, -50, and -47 mV, respectively, under slightly acidic pH (4.5-4.8) conditions. No evidence of ionic strength induced aggregation was found using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS): diffusion coefficients increased slightly (< 25%) with increasing ionic strength (up to 1 M). Negative electrophoretic mobilities decreased to a maximum measured ionic strength of 0.18 M. Above this ionic strength, no peaks were observed due to an increased HS adsorption to the capillary wall and an important decrease in electroosmotic flow. Interpretation of electrophoretic mobilities determined by CE is complicated by the fact that under certain conditions, HS appeared to be complexed by CE buffer systems, including MES, BES, and AMPSO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available