4.5 Article

Effect of barley and barley components on rheological properties of wheat dough

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 251-260

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1006/jcrs.2000.0363

Keywords

barley/wheat blends; dough rheology; starch; non-starch polysaccharides

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of addition of whole barley and barley components (starch, beta -glucans and arabinoxylans) on rheological properties of dough prepared from wheat flours with variable gluten quality (cv. Glenlea, extra-strong; cv. Katepwa, very strong; cv. AC Karma, strong; and cv. AC Reed, weak) were investigated in these studies using Mixograph and dynamic rheological measurements. Whole barley meal, starch and non-starch polysaccharides from hulless barley with variable starch characteristics (normal, high amylose, waxy, and zero amylose waxy) were tested. Upon addition of either beta -glucans or arabinoxylans, significant increases in peak dough resistance, mixing stability, and work input were recorded in all flours. The addition of starch to various wheat flours reduced the strength of the respective flour-water doughs. The improvement of dough strength upon addition of waxy or zero amylose waxy barley meal was associated with the high content of total and soluble beta -glucans present in barley samples. The addition of arabinoxylans or beta -glucans increased the G' of wheat doughs; arabinoxylans had a greater effect than beta -glucans. Starch substantially decreased the elastic modulus of dough prepared from cv. Glenlea but waxy and high amylose starches increased the G' of dough prepared from cv. AC Karma. A combination of the high amounts of non-starch polysaccharides and unusual starch characteristics in barley seems to balance the negative effects associated with gluten dilution brought about by addition of barley into wheat flour. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available