4.6 Article

Myocardial enzymatic activity of renin and cathepsin D before and after bilateral nephrectomy

Journal

BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages 659-668

Publisher

DR DIETRICH STEINKOPFF VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s003950170019

Keywords

renin-angiotensin system; cardiac myocytes; angiotensin; cardiac renin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A local renin-angiotensin system is present within the myocardium and can play a role in the initiation and maintenance of cardiac hypertrophy. The source of myocardial renin may be direct cardiac renin gene expression, or plasma renin of renal origin. A primary indication that myocardial renin is derived from plasma renin of renal origin was from work showing that cardiac renin activity was no longer detected 30 hours after bilateral nephrectomy (BNX). However, more recent studies have been able to detect myocardial renin after BNX. We measured normal rat cardiac renin before and after 48-hour BNX using a myocardial renin assay with improved sensitivity. The myocardial renin assay was also used to assess normal rat cardiac myocyte renin levels. Since cardiac tissue contains cathepsin D, a lysosomal enzyme capable of renin-like activity, a rat cathepsin D assay was also developed to assess cathepsin D contribution to renin-like activity. Several artifacts were shown to contribute to myocardial renin-like enzymatic activity levels after BNX, including initial plasma renin stimulation during BNX surgery, assay pH, and cardiac cathepsin D activity. Myocardial renin concentration after 48-BNX was found to be only similar to1 % of normal control levels, and renin concentration in normal cardiac myocytes was only 2-fold greater than assay blanks. Both results were probably overestimated due to cathepsin D contamination. In conclusion, no evidence was found for myocardial renin synthesis in the normal adult rat heart, and myocardial renin decays to near zero levels after 48-hour BNX.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available