4.6 Article

Gender differences in cytokine secretion by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells:: Role of estrogen in modulating LPS-induced cytokine secretion in an ex vivo septic model

Journal

SHOCK
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 340-343

Publisher

BIOMEDICAL PRESS
DOI: 10.1097/00024382-200116050-00003

Keywords

sex differences; estradiol; endotoxin; cytokine; healthy volunteer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clinical studies demonstrate a better outcome of sepsis in females. Elevated estrogen levels and plasma cytokine imbalance occur in septic patients. We propose that gender-different cytokine secretion by the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in sepsis determines the clinical outcome. A 2 x 10(6) PBMC sample from healthy volunteers (10 males and 10 females) was incubated with 1 ng/mL of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), estradiol (E-2; 0, 0.03, 0.3, 3.0, 30 ng/mL), or 1 ng/mL of LPS + E-2 (0, 0.03, 0.3, 3.0, 30 ng/ml), and supernatant cytokine levels were measured. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) and interleukin (IL)-6 production by PBMCs from both sexes was time-dependently stimulated by LPS. At 6 h after LPS challenge, the TNF alpha level of male PBMCs was significantly higher but IL-6 secretion by female PBMCs was higher (two-way ANOVA: P<0.05). E-2 alone stimulated cytokine secretion by male PBMCs. Addition of the same E-2 concentration as in sepsis patients' plasma modulated LPS-induced cytokine production. No significant sex differences in LPS-stimulated TNF or IL-6 secretion by PBMCs were found, but IL-10 secretion by male PBMCs was significantly suppressed. This study demonstrated a gender difference in PBMCs responsiveness to LPS and E-2 stimulation and E-2-modulated cytokine secretion. In this PBMCs model of sepsis, only the supernatant IL-10 level was significantly lower in males. These ex vivo findings may partially explain the mechanism underlying the poorer outcome of male sepsis patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available