4.5 Article

Genetic diversity and the mating system of a rare Mexican pinon, Pinus pinceana, and a comparison with Pinus maximartinezii (Pinaceae)

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 88, Issue 11, Pages 1977-1987

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.2307/3558425

Keywords

endangered species; fitness; fragmentation; genetic distance; genetic structure; isozymes; pollen allele frequencies; selfing

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Weeping pinon (Pinus pinceana) has a restricted and fragmented range, trees are widely scattered within populations, and reproduction is limited. Nevertheless, genetic diversity was high; based on 27 isozyme loci in 18 enzyme systems, unbiased expected heterozygosity averaged 0.174. Differentiation also was high (F-sr = 0.152), reflecting isolation between southern, central, and northern fragments of the range. Among populations in the northern fragment, F-sr was only 0.056, and the number of migrants per generation (Nm) was 4.21, which should preclude fixation. Nm between central and southern populations or between them and populations in the northern fragment was lower, 0.99-1.66, indicating a degree of genetic isolation. Multilocus outcrossing rates (t(m)) ranged from 0.836 in the south to 0.897 in the north. Therefore, selling is low but statistically significant. The equilibrium inbreeding coefficient (F-e) calculated from t(m) was in good agreement with observed inbreeding coefficients, suggesting that weeping pinon may be near equilibrium with respect to inbreeding and selection against selfed trees. Weeping pinon was variable at all loci polymorphic in maxipinon (Pinus maximartinezii) and, therefore, qualities as a possible progenitor of maxipinon. Because of the high level of diversity, reasonable levels of gene flow within the northern fragment of weeping pinon's range, high rates of outcrossing, and, perhaps, only weak selection against inbred trees, protection in reserves would be a viable option for conservation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available