3.8 Article

Effect of cycling cadence on contractile and neural properties of knee extensors

Journal

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
Volume 33, Issue 11, Pages 1882-1888

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200111000-00013

Keywords

pedaling rate; fatigue; activation level; muscular torque; isometric twitch

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This study investigated the effect of prior prolonged cycling exercise performed at different cadences on subsequent neuromuscular characteristics. Methods: Eight well-trained triathletes sustained 80% of their maximal aerobic power during 30 min at three cadences: the freely chosen cadence (FCC), FCC-20%, and FCC+20%. Maximal isometric and concentric (120 degrees .s(-1) and 240 degrees .s(-1)) torques were recorded before and after the exercise. Central activation, neural (M-wave), and contractile (isometric muscular twitch) parameters of quadriceps muscle were also analyzed by electrical stimulation of the femoral nerve. Results: Reductions in maximal isometric (P<0.01) and concentric torques at 120.s(-1) (P<0.05) were found after exercise. Central activation levels fell significantly (P<0.05) by 13-16% depending on the pedaling rate. Although the M-wave did not significantly change after exercise, the ratio EMG RMS/M-wave amplitude decreased significantly (P<0.01) on both vastus lateralis and vastus medialis muscles for FCC-20% and FCC but not for FCC+20%. Significant decreases in maximal twitch tension (P<0.01), maximal rate of twitch development (P<0.01), and time to half relaxation (P<0.01) were observed postexercise with no effect of cadence. Conclusions: These findings suggest that force reduction after prolonged cycling is attributable to both central and peripheral factors but is not influenced by the pedaling rate in a range of FCC 20%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available