3.8 Article

The avian olfactory system as a model for the analysis of apoptosis and cellular regeneration.

Journal

ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE
Volume 126, Issue 9, Pages 888-895

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-3944(01)00619-8

Keywords

apoptosis; cell regeneration; differentiation; olfactory system; stem cell

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A reliable model, usable in vitro and in vivo, is necessary for analysis of processes engaged during cell death, regeneration and differentiation, The peripheral olfactory system is an attractive model for studying these processes through its dynamic neurogenesis that occurs continually throughout the lifetime. Study aim: The aim of this study was the analysis of these processes on an animal model. Material and methods: We performed axotomy of the nerve olfactory on young animals and chicken embryos E17. Then we infused IGF-I (insulin-like growth factor-I) in the lesioned site. Death, regeneration and differenciation of cells were studied by immunocytology. Results: After hatching, the section of the olfactory nerve induced a rapid neuronal apoptosis at the 24th hour followed by a wave of mitosis 24 hours later. In prenatal stages, the response to the axotomy was rather similar to a dedifferentiation. In postnatal stages, the IGF-I infusion at the lesioned site had a triple function: survival of mature neurons, maintenance of differentiation and stimulation of mitosis. The neoneurogenesis, which occured from neuronal stem cells would depend on the maturation and environment of the olfactory neurons protected from apoptosis by IGF-I. Conclusion: The avian olfactory epithelium is a good model for analysis of cell death, regeneration and differentiation. The capacity of these neuronal stem cells to dedifferentiate makes then more primitive than the pluripotent cells, closer to totipotent embryonic stem cells. (C) 2001 Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available