4.6 Article

c-Rel is required for the protection of B cells from antigen receptor-mediated, but not Fas-mediated, apoptosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 167, Issue 9, Pages 4948-4956

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.9.4948

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA68155] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [T32A107621] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The NF-kappaB/Rel transcription factor family has been shown to protect many cell types from apoptotic signals. However, it is not known whether NF-kappaB is required for all survival pathways and whether each NF-kappaB member plays a unique or a redundant role. Here we describe the results of studies on the role of c-Rel in survival. Mature B cells from c-Rel(-/-) mice exhibit defects in survival, including sensitivity to Ag receptor-mediated apoptosis as well as increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation and glucocorticoids. Transgene expression of Bcl-x(L), a c-Rel target gene, rescues c-Rel(-/-) B cells from their survival defects. Thus, c-Rel-dependent survival pathways are crucial for protection from apoptotic signals that target the mitochondrial pathway. Despite a lack of Bcl-x(L), c-Rel-/- B cells can still be rescued from Fas-mediated apoptosis via B cell receptor signaling. The Fas apoptosis inhibitor molecule and FLICE inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) proteins are up-regulated normally in c-Rel(-/-) B cells, and these two molecules may play a more physiological role in the Fas pathway. Furthermore, unlike the TNF sensitivity of RelA(-/-) fibroblasts, c-Rel-deficient fibroblasts are refractory to TNF-mediated cell death. Thus, c-Rel is dispensable for protection against death receptor-mediated apoptosis. Taken together, our data suggest that distinct NF-kappaB/Rel members are required for protecting cells from different types of apoptotic signals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available