4.7 Article

A direct link between forest vegetation type and soil organic matter composition

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 104, Issue 1-2, Pages 41-60

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00055-6

Keywords

TOSS CP/MAS C-13 NMR spectroscopy; soil organic matter; Quercus; Arctostaphylos; Pinus; size fractionation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Total carbon storage and turnover in soils can be simulated as a series of pools with different turnover rates, ranging from seasonal to millennial. This approach has emphasized the importance of climatic controls on soil organic matter (SOM) dynamics, but implicitly assumes that SOM is minimally influenced by the nature of the plant material from which it is derived. Here we test this assumption by contrasting the influence of climate and vegetation (oak, manzanita, and conifers) on SOM composition in granitic-derived soils from California. Soils developed under the same climate in the San Gabriel Mountains were compared to soils with varying climate along an elevational transect in the Sierra Nevada range. Solid state TOSS CPMAS C-13 NMR was used to semiquantitatively characterize the chemical structure of organic matter in litter layers, and low-density and fine silt fractions isolated from sampled A horizons. For all soils, there was a progressive decrease in O-alkyl C, and an increase in alkyl and carbonyl C from the litter to the low-density and fine silt fractions. The NMR spectra of the low-density fractions, and even more so of the fine silt fractions exhibited clear differences in SOM composition associated with different plant genera, regardless of climate. The carbonyl C dominated under oak, O-alkyl C prevailed under manzanita, and alkyl C was prominent under coniferous vegetation. These results indicate that vegetation, not climate, was the factor controlling SOM composition in these soils, and should be taken as a caution against a simplistic climatic interpretation of storage and turnover rate of carbon in soils. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available