4.4 Article

Clinical significance of cell proliferation, microvessel density, and CD44 adhesion molecule expression in renal cell carcinoma

Journal

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 11, Pages 1209-1215

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/hupa.2001.28957

Keywords

renal cell carcinoma; CD44; Ki-67; CD34; immunohistochemistry; prognosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is known to have a wide variation in Clinical outcome despite the use of conventional prognostic factors, such as staging or grading. A better knowledge of the biologic aggressiveness of RCC could facilitate the selection of patients at high risk of tumor progression. The aim of this study was to determine if use of measurements of vascular density, cell proliferation, and cell adhesion could better predict the biologic behavior of RCC. We immunohistochemically analyzed CD34, Ki-67, and CD44H expression on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from 73 RCCs for quantifying microvessel density (MVD), Ki-67 labeling index (LI), and CD44H LI, respectively. Univariate cancer-specific survival analysis showed that tumor stage (P <.01), tumor size (P <.001), nuclear grade (P <.01), metastasis (P <.001), MVD (P <.03), Ki-67 LI (P <.001), and CD44H Ll (P <.0001) were predictors of tumor-related death. There was a statistical correlation between CD44H LI and both Ki-67 Ll (r' =.3) and MVD (r' = -.44). Ki-67 LI (P <.04) and CD44H LI (P <.02), as well as metastasis (P <.008), emerged as independent predictors of cancer-specific survival in multivariate analysis in patients with metastases (P <.04 and P <.02, respectively) and in patients without metastases (P <.006 and P <.00001, respectively). Our study suggests that vascular density, cell proliferation, and cell adhesion represent a complex tumor-host interaction that may favor progression of RCC. Cell proliferation and CD44H expression appear to be powerful markers to identify patients with an adverse prognosis. HUM PATHOL 32:1209-1215. Copyright (C) 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available