4.6 Article

A systematic study of X-ray substructure of galaxy clusters detected in the ROSAT All-Sky Survey

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 378, Issue 2, Pages 408-427

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011215

Keywords

galaxies : clusters : general

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Results of a systematic study of substructure in X-ray surface brightness distributions of a combined sample of 470 REFLEX+BCS clusters of galaxies are presented. The fully automated morphology analysis is based on data of the 3rd processing of the ROSAT All-Sky survey (RASS-3). After correction for several systematic effects, 52 +/- 7 percent of the REFLEX+BCS clusters are found to be substructured in metric apertures of 1 Mpc radius (H-0 = 50 kms(-1) Mpc(-1)). Future simulations will show statistically which mass spectrum of major and minor mergers contributes to this number. Another important result is the discovery of a substructure-density relation, analogous to the morphology-density relation for galaxies. Here, clusters with asymmetric or multi-modal X-ray surface brightness distributions are located preferentially in regions with higher cluster number densities. The substructure analysis techniques are used to compare the X-ray morphology of 53 clusters with radio halos and relics, and 22 cooling ow clusters with the REFLEX+BCS reference sample. After careful equalization of the different sensitivities of the subsamples to substructure detection it is found that the halo and relic sample tends to show more often multi-modal and elongated X-ray surface brightness distributions compared to the REFLEX+BCS reference sample. The cooling ow clusters show more often circular symmetric and unimodal distributions compared to the REFLEX+BCS and the halo/relic reference samples. Both findings further support the idea that radio halos and relics are triggered by merger events, and that pre-existing cooling flows might be disrupted by recent major mergers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available