4.1 Article

Association of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma with the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome

Journal

PEDIATRIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 550-558

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s10024001-0110-6

Keywords

11p15; alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma; Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome; cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a soft tissue tumor of childhood frequently diagnosed between the first and fifth year of life. Children with the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), a congenital overgrowth syndrome characterized by exomphalos, macroglossia, and macrosomia, have an increased risk of developing childhood tumors including Wilms tumor, hepatoblastoma, neuroblastoma, and RMS. Although an association between RMS and the BWS is well accepted, only four cases have been reported to date, and of these, three were reported as embryonal RMS. Based on these data, an association between BWS and embryonal RMS has been proposed. We report three additional cases of BWS with RMS and review the clinical data for each patient as well as the pathology of their tumors. All three cases of BWS had histology consistent with alveolar RMS and were diagnosed at 6 weeks and 5 and 13 years of age. In two of these BWS cases, constitutional defects of 11p15 imprinting were demonstrated. Furthermore, cytogenetic analysis of the tumors did not detect the t(2;13) or t(1;13) translocations that generate the PAX3- or PAX7-FKHR fusion proteins common to alveolar RMS. These observations suggest that the development of alveolar RMS tumors in BWS may occur without the chromosomal rearrangement producing the PAX-FKHR fusion protein. In summary, we present three new cases of RMS demonstrating a new association between BWS and an uncommon subtype of alveolar RMS. The absence of the translocations commonly associated with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. suggests a common 11p15 pathway for alveolar RMS and BWS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available