3.8 Article

Sensitivity and specificity of anthropometrics for the prediction of diabetes in a biracial cohort

Journal

OBESITY RESEARCH
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 696-705

Publisher

NORTH AMER ASSOC STUDY OBESITY
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2001.94

Keywords

diabetes; blacks; fat patterning; epidemiology; cut-point

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01-HC-55021, N01-HC-55015, N01-HC-55020, N01-HC-55022, N01-HC-55016, N01-HC-55018] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the ability of body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and combinations of these variables to discriminate individuals who will develop diabetes in adulthood. Research Methods and Procedures: Data were from 45- to 64-year-old men and women who were members of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities cohort. The analysis sample consisted of 12,814 African American and white participants who were free of diabetes at baseline. Body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and diabetes incidence (defined as one glucose measure greater than or equal to 126 mg/dL after fasting for at least 8 hours, one nonfasting glucose measure greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL, and self-report of diabetes or report of taking medication for diabetes). Results: 1515 new cases of diabetes were identified over the 9-year follow-up. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves ranged from 0.66 to 0.73 for single measures. The curves were smooth, with no indication of a threshold. Waist tended to have the highest receiver operating characteristic statistic in all groups, but differences were small. Discussion: The three anthropometric indices tested were approximately equivalent in their ability to predict diabetes. Sensitivity and specificities differed among ethnic and gender groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available