4.6 Article

Heterofermentative pattern and exopolysaccharide production by Lactobacillus helveticus ATCC 15807 in response to environmental pH

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages 846-852

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01450.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: The objective of this work was to evaluate the fermentation pattern of and the exopolysaccharide (EPS) production by Lactobacillus helveticus ATCC 15807 in milk batch cultures under controlled pH (4.5, 5.0 and 6.2). Methods and Results: EPS concentration was estimated by the phenol/sulphuric acid method and the chemical composition of purified EPS by HPLC. Fermentation products and residual sugars were determined by HPLC and enzymatic methods. The micro-organism shifted from a homofermentative to a heterofermentative pattern, producing acetate (9.5 and 5.8 mmol l(-1)) at pH 5.0 and 6.2, respectively, and acetate (7.1 mmol l(-1)) plus succinate (1.2 mmol l(-1)) at pH 4.5. At pH 5.0 and 6.2, acetate derived from citrate while at pH 4.5 it came from both citrate and pyruvate splitting. The EPS has a MW of 10(5)-10(6) and contains phosphate (81% in average), rhamnose (traces), and glucose and galactose in a ratio of 1 : 1 (pH 6.2) and 2 : 1 (pH 4.5 and 5.0). The highest production (549 mg l(-1)) corresponded to pH 5.0 and the lowest (49 mg l(-1)) to pH 6.2. Conclusions: The heterofermentative pattern of Lact. helveticus ATCC 15807 was linked to alternative pyruvate pathways and/or citrate metabolism according to the environmental pH. The EPS production was improved under low environmental pH conditions. Significance and Impact of the Study: This work provides relevant information of the effect of pH on the metabolism of citrate and EPS production by Lact. helveticus. It may contribute to improve technological aspects of ropy and citrate-utilizing lactic acid bacteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available