Journal
FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages 974-980Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02858-8
Keywords
contraception; transcervical sterilization; intratubal devices; histology of tubal tissue response; tubal occlusion
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: The present study examines the safety, effectiveness, and local tissue response for a new transcervical fallopian tube permanent contraceptive device, the STOP device (Conceptus, Inc., San Carlos, CA). Design: Nonrandomized prospective evaluation of tubal occlusion and histologic response. Setting: Inpatient, university and university-affiliated medical centers in the United States and Mexico. Patient(s): Premenopausal and perimenopausal women with benign indications for hysterectomy who were able to defer their hysterectomy for 1 to 13 weeks. Intervention(s): A transcervically placed microcoil (STOP device) was inserted into the fallopian tubes of women who were scheduled for hysterectomy, and the device was worn for 1 to 12 weeks. At hysterectomy, hysterosalpingography was done to determine tubal occlusion; subsequently, the tubes containing the STOP devices were processed, sectioned, and evaluated to determine the histologic response. Main Outcome Measure(s): Ability to place a device and evaluate tubal occlusion and tissue response. Result(s): Devices were placed in 33 women, representing 57 tubes; the women wore the devices from 1 day to 30 weeks. Histology on 27 women (47 tubes) showed an acute inflammatory and fibrotic response in the short term that, over time, became a chronic inflammatory response with extensive fibrosis. Conclusion(s): The localized tissue response and notable absence of any normal tubal architecture in the segment of the fallopian tube containing the STOP device supports the postulated mechanisms of action of the device. Prehysterectomy study findings suggest the usefulness of the STOP device for pregnancy prevention, this is being evaluated in long-term safety and effectiveness studies. (C) 2001 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available