4.8 Article

Utilizing flow cytometry to monitor autophagy in living mammalian cells

Journal

AUTOPHAGY
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 621-628

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/auto.5939

Keywords

autophagy; LC3; FACS; amino acids; starvation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Autophagy is a major intracellular catabolic pathway that takes part in diverse biological events including response to amino acid starvation, protein and organelle turnover, development, aging, pathogen infection and cell death. However, experimental methods to monitor this process in mammalian cells are limited due to lack of autophagic markers. Recently, MAP1-LC3 (LC3), a mammalian homologue of the ubiquitin-like (UBL) protein Atg8, was shown to selectively incorporate into autophagosome, thus serving as a unique bona fide marker of autophagosomes in mammals. However, current methods to quantify autophagic activity using LC3 are time-consuming, labor-intensive and require much experience for accurate interpretation. Here we took advantage of the Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter (FRCS) to quantify the turnover of GFP-LC3 as an assay to measure autophagic activity in living mammalian cells. We showed that during induction of autophagy by rapamycin, tunicamycin or starvation to amino acids, fluorescence intensity of GFP-LC3 is reduced in a time-dependent manner. This decrease occurred specifically in wild type LC3, but not in mutant LC3(G120A), and was inhibited by autophagic or lysosomal inhibitors, indicating that this signal is specific to selective autophagy-mediated delivery of LC3 into lysosomes. By utilizing this assay, we tested the minimal nutrient requirement for the autophagic process and determined its induction by deprivation of specific single amino acids. We conclude that this approach can be successfully applied to different cell-lines as a reliable and simple method to quantify autophagic activity in living mammalian cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available