4.6 Article

Polymorphisms of human aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) gene in a French population:: relationship with CYP1A1 inducibility and lung cancer

Journal

CARCINOGENESIS
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages 1819-1824

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/22.11.1819

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Ah receptor (AhR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that positively regulates the expression of the CYP1A1 gene. We investigated the genetic polymorphisms of the AhR gene including the promoter, and examined the link between these polymorphisms, CYP1A1 inducibility and the lung cancer incidence. The AhR promoter region and the 11 exons of 30 subjects were screened. Among the three polymorphisms found, two [(2417)(A/G) ((157)G/A)] have never been described previously. The (1721)(G/A) and (2417)(A/G) are localized in exon 10 and lead to Arg(554)Lys and Met(786)Val substitutions, respectively. The other polymorphism was found in the 5 ' -untransiated region, resulting in the substitution of a G by an A at position 157 (157)(G/A). To evaluate the frequency of this allelic variant found, a DNA library of a case-control study of lung cancer (162 controls and 177 patients) was studied. There is no significant association between (1721)(G/A), (157)(G/A) and lung cancer: (1721)(G/A) and (157)(G/A) were detected at the same allele frequency of 0.086 and 0.25, respectively in both controls and patients. (2417)(A/G) was found in only one control of 100 (allele frequency 0.005). Statistical analysis did not show any relationship between both (1721)(G/A) and (157)(G/A) polymorphisms found and CYP1A1 inducibility. Considering the rareness of the (2417)(A/G) allelic variant we were not able to evaluate its association with inducibility. In conclusion, none of the polymorphisms were found to play a key role in the CYP1A1 inducibility or in the susceptibility to develop lung cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available