4.5 Article

Quantitation of Na+-K+-2Cl- cotransport splice variants in human tissues using kinetic polymerase chain reaction

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 298, Issue 2, Pages 218-230

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/abio.2001.5398

Keywords

cotransport; RNA; kinetic RT-PCR; alternative splicing; tissue distribution; trabecular meshwork; brain

Funding

  1. NHGRI NIH HHS [R01-HG01736] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A kinetic reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based assay is described that can discriminate and quantitate differentially spliced mRNAs. This assay should be generally applicable for high-throughput quantitation of differentially spliced transcripts. The utility of this method was assessed for spliced transcripts encoded by the human Na+-K+-2Cl(-) cotransporter gene hNKCC1. Evidence. is presented that the NKCC1 isoform. of the human Na+-K+-2Cl(-) cotransporter is differentially spliced analogous to that recently described for the mouse Na+-K+-2Cl(-) cotransporter gene BSC2. The nucleotide sequences of the two human splice variants predict Na+-K+-2Cl(-) cotransporter proteins differing only in length. Stable transfectants expressing these human splice variants, designated NKCC1a or NKCC1b, were constructed. Both splice variants produce functional Na+-K+-2Cl(-) cotransporters in vivo. The abundance of NRCC1 mRNA and patterns of differential splicing in 10 different tissue types and three cell lines were quantitated using the kRT-PCR assay. The results showed that the total amount of NKCC1 mRNA varied by more than 30-fold in the human tissues and cell lines examined. The ratio of NKCC1a/NKCC1b varied nearly 70-fold among these same tissues and cell lines suggesting that differential splicing of the NKCC1 transcript may play a regulatory role in human tissues. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available