4.4 Article

Sequential docking, molecular differentiation, and positioning of T-tubule/SR junctions in developing mouse skeletal muscle

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 239, Issue 2, Pages 204-214

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0437

Keywords

development; excitation-contraction coupling; Ca2+ release unit; ryanodine receptor; sarcoplasmic reticulum; skeletal muscle; transverse tubules

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [P01 AR 44650] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Skeletal muscle Ca2+ release units (CRUs) are junctions of the surface membrane/T-tubule system and the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) that function in excitation-contraction coupling. They contain high concentrations of dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs) in the T-tubules and of ryanodine receptors (RyR) in the SR and they are positioned at specific locations in the sarcomere. In order to characterize the sequence of developmental steps leading to the specific molecular and structural organization of CRUs, we applied a range of imaging techniques that allowed us to follow the differentiation of the membrane compartments and the expression of junctional proteins in developing mouse diaphragm muscle. We find that docking of the two membrane systems precedes the incorporation of the RyRs into the junctions, and that T-tubule/SR junctions are formed and positioned at the I-A interface at a stage when the orientation of T-tubule is predominantly longitudinal. Thus, the sequence of developmental events is first the docking of T-tubules and SR, secondly the incorporation of RyR in the junctions, thirdly the positioning of the junctions in the sarcomere, and only much later the transverse orientation of the T-tubules. These sequential stages suggests an order of inductive processes for the molecular differentiation and structural organization of the CRUs in skeletal muscle development. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available