4.6 Article

Simulation study of the effect of the early mortality exclusion on confounding of the exposure-mortality relation by preexisting disease

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 154, Issue 10, Pages 963-971

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/154.10.963

Keywords

aging; body mass index; confounding factors (epidemiology); epidemiologic methods

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authors conducted a simulation study to evaluate whether exclusion of the early mortality (deaths occurring during a prespecified period immediately after baseline) reduces confounding of the exposure-mortality relation by preexisting disease. The simulation specified an exposure that decreased mortality risk in the absence of confounding and then introduced confounding by preexisting disease that biased the true protective effect of exposure towards greater risk. In 2,000 cohorts, exclusion of the early mortality (deaths occurring during the first 25 months of a 60-month follow-up period) did not alter the mean hazard ratio for exposure under conditions of confounding by preexisting disease that produced a constant, threefold increase in mortality risk during follow-up (the mean hazard ratio was 1.72 for all subjects and 1.72 after exclusion of the early mortality). However, when the authors specified confounding by preexisting disease which produced a threefold increase in mortality risk that attenuated over time, exclusion of the early mortality consistently identified the true protective effect of exposure (the,mean hazard ratio was 1.07 for all subjects and 0.31 after exclusion of the early mortality). Thus, under conditions of confounding by preexisting disease which produces an increase in mortality risk that attenuates over time-an effect that does have empirical support-the early mortality exclusion can be very effective in revealing the true exposure-mortality relation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available