4.6 Article

Inhibition of pancreatic protein secretion by ghrelin in the rat

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 537, Issue 1, Pages 231-236

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0231k.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK043225, R01 DK 43225] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1. The role of ghrelin in the regulation of pancreatic protein secretion was investigated in vivo using anaesthetized rats with pancreatic ductal cannulas, and in isolated pancreatic acinar cells and pancreatic lobules in vitro. indirect and may be exerted at the level of intrapancreatic neurons. 2. In vivo, pancreatic protein output stimulated by CCK-8 (400 pmol kg(-1) h(-1)) was dose-dependently inhibited by continuous ghrelin infusion (1.2 and 12 nmol kg(-1) h(-1)) by 45 +/- 8 and 84 +/- 7%, respectively. 3. In rats with acute subdiaphragmatic vagotomy, ghrelin (12 nmol kg(-1) h(-1)) significantly inhibited CCK-stimulated pancreatic protein secretion by 75 +/- 18%. 4. Infusion of ghrelin (12 nmol kg(-1) h(-1)) abolished pancreatic protein secretion caused by the central vagal stimulant 2-deoxy-D-glucose (75 mg kg(-1)), whereas bethanechol-stimulated pancreatic protein output was inhibited by only 59 +/- 7%. 5. In vitro, ghrelin (10(-11)-10(-7) M) produced no change in basal amylase release from dispersed, purified acinar cells. Co-incubation of ghrelin (10(-11)-10(-7) M) with CCK-8 (10(-10) M) demonstrated no inhibition of CCK-stimulated amylase release from dispersed acini. In contrast, ghrelin (10(-9)-10(-7) M) dose-dependently inhibited amylase release from pancreatic lobules exposed to 75 rum potassium. 6. Our results show that (1) ghrelin is a potent inhibitor of pancreatic exocrine secretion in anaesthetized rats in vivo and in pancreatic lobules in vitro; and (2) the actions of ghrelin are indirect and may be exerted at the level of intrapancreatic neurons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available