4.7 Article

Three-dimensional spectral classification of low-metallicity stars using artificial neural networks

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 562, Issue 1, Pages 528-548

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/323428

Keywords

Galaxy : halo; methods : data analysis; nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances; stars : abundances; stars : Population II

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We explore the application of artificial neural networks (ANNs) for the estimation of atmospheric parameters (T-eff, log g, and [Fe/H]) for Galactic F- and G-type stars. The ANNs are fed with medium- resolution (Delta lambda similar to 1-2 Angstrom) non-flux-calibrated spectroscopic observations. From a sample of 279 stars with previous high-resolution determinations of metallicity and a set of (external) estimates of temperature and surface gravity, our ANNs are able to predict T-eff with an accuracy of sigma (T-eff) = 135-150 K over the range 4250 less than or equal to T-eff less than or equal to 6500 K, log g with an accuracy of sigma (log g) = 0.25-0.30 dex over the range 1.0 less than or equal to log g less than or equal to 5.0 dex, and [Fe/H] with an accuracy sigma([Fe/H]) = 0.15-0.20 dex over the range -4.0 less than or equal to [Fe/H] less than or equal to 0.3. Such accuracies are competitive with the results obtained by fine analysis of high-resolution spectra. It is noteworthy that the ANNs are able to obtain these results without consideration of photometric information for these stars. We have also explored the impact of the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) on the behavior of ANNs and conclude that, when analyzed with ANNs trained on spectra of commensurate S/N, it is possible to extract physical parameter estimates of similar accuracy with stellar spectra having S/N as low as 13. Taken together, these results indicate that the ANN approach should be of primary importance for use in present and future large-scale spectroscopic surveys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available