4.6 Article

Enzyme microgels in packed-bed bioreactors with downstream amperometric detection using microfabricated interdigitated microsensor electrode arrays

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages 475-484

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.10069

Keywords

hydrogels; amperometry; glucose oxidase; glutamate oxidase; glucose; monosodium glutamate; interdigitated microsensor electrode arrays

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, we describe the use of pH-responsive hydrogels as matrices for the immobilization of two enzymes, glucose oxidase (GOx) and glutamate oxidase (GlutOx). Spherical hydrogel beads were prepared by inverse suspension polymerization and the enzymes were immobilized by either physical entrapment or covalent immobilization within or on the hydrogel surface. Packed-bed bioreactors were prepared containing the bioactive hydrogels and these incorporated into flow injection (Fl) systems for the quantitation of glucose and monosodium glutamate (MSG) respectively. The Fl amperometric detector comprised a microfabricated Interdigitated array within a thin-layer flow cell. For the Fl manifold incorporating immobilized GOx, glucose response curves were found to be linear over the concentration range 1.8-280 my dL(-1) (0.1-15.5 mM) with a detection limit of 1.4 mg dL(-1) (0.08 mM). Up to 20 samples can be manually analyzed per hour, with the hydrogel-GOx bioreactor exhibiting good within-day (0-19%) precision. The optimized Fl manifold for MSG quantitation yielded a linear response range of up to 135 mg dL(-1) (8 mM) with a detection limit of 3.38 mg dL(-1) (0.2 mM) and a throughput of 30 samples h(-1). Analysis of commercially produced soup samples gave a within-day precision of 3.6%. Bioreactors containing these two physically entrapped enzymes retained > 60% of their initial activities after a storage period of up to 1 year. (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available