4.1 Article

Effect of cold or thermoneutral water immersion on post-exercise heart rate recovery and heart rate variability indices

Journal

AUTONOMIC NEUROSCIENCE-BASIC & CLINICAL
Volume 156, Issue 1-2, Pages 111-116

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2010.03.017

Keywords

Short-term recovery; Autonomic nervous system; Vagal-related indices

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the effect of cold and thermoneutral water immersion on post-exercise parasympathetic reactivation, inferred from heart rate (HR) recovery (HRR) and HR variability (HRV) indices. Twelve men performed, on three separate occasions, an intermittent exercise bout (all-out 30-s Wingate test, 5 min seated recovery, followed by 5 min of submaximal running exercise), randomly followed by 5 min of passive (seated) recovery under either cold (CWI), thermoneutral water immersion (TWI) or control (CON) conditions. HRR indices (e.g., heart beats recovered in the first minute after exercise cessation, HRR60s) and vagal-related HRV indices (i.e., natural logarithm of the square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of differences between adjacent normal R-R intervals (Ln rMSSD)) were calculated for the three recovery conditions. HRR60s was faster in water immersion compared with CON conditions [30 +/- 9 beats min(-1) for CON vs. 43 +/- 10 beats min(-1) for TWI (P=0.003) and 40 +/- 13 beats min(-1) for CWI (P= 0.017)], while no difference was found between CWI and TWI (P= 0.763). Ln rMSSD was higher in CWI (2.32 +/- 0.67 ms) compared with CON (1.98 +/- 0.74 ms, P=0.05) and TWI (2.01 +/- 0.61 ms, P=0.08; aES =1.07) conditions, with no difference between CON and TWI (P= 0.964). Water immersion is a simple and efficient means of immediately triggering post-exercise parasympathetic activity, with colder immersion temperatures likely to be more effective at increasing parasympathetic activity. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available