4.7 Article

Shear stress regulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression through c-Src by divergent signaling pathways

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 89, Issue 11, Pages 1073-1080

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hh2301.100806

Keywords

endothelial nitric oxide synthase; c-Src; ERK1/2; Raf; mRNA stability

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL58000, HL59248, HL390006] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we defined the signaling cascade responsible for increased eNOS mRNA expression in response to laminar shear stress. This pathway depends on the tyrosine kinase c-Src because shear induction of eNOS mRNA is blocked by the c-Src inhibitors PP1 and PP2, as well as an adenovirus encoding kinase inactive c-Src. After activation of c-Src, this pathway diverges. One arm is responsible for the short-term (6 hour) increase in eNOS mRNA. This involves a transient, 1-hour increase in eNOS transcription, as detected by nuclear run-on, that is dependent on activation of Ras and is blocked by adenoviral infection with dominant negative Ras. Downstream of Ras, MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 are important in this pathway, as 2 inhibitors of MEK1/2, PD98059 and UO126, completely prevented this early increase in eNOS mRNA. ERK1/2 was rapidly phosphorylated in response to shear, and this was prevented by c-Src and Ras inhibition. Further, Raf is phosphorylated in response to shear stress, and this is prevented by c-Src inhibition, suggesting that Raf may transduce the signal between Ras and ERK1/2. The second arm of the pathway linking activation of c-Src to eNOS expression involves stabilization of eNOS mRNA by shear stress. This response to shear is completely abrogated by the c-Src inhibitor PP1 but not altered by Ras or MEK1/2 inhibition. Thus, c-Src plays a central role in modulation of eNOS expression in response to shear stress via divergent pathways involving a short-term increase in eNOS transcription and a longer-term stabilization of eNOS mRNA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available