4.8 Article

Evidence that a burst of DNA depurination in SENCAR mouse skin induces error-prone repair and forms mutations in the H-ras gene

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 20, Issue 55, Pages 7945-7953

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204969

Keywords

estradiol-3,4-quinone; depurinating adducts; abasic sites; DNA repair; mismatched heteroduplex; H-ras mutation in SENCAR mouse skin

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA49210, CA 36727] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [P41 RR 00954] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Treatment of SENCAR mouse skin with dibenzo[a,l]pyrene results in abundant formation of abasic sites that undergo error-prone excision repair, forming oncogenic H-ras mutations in the early preneoplastic period. To examine whether the abundance of abasic sites causes repair infidelity, we treated SENCAR mouse skin with estradiol-3,4-quinone (E-2-3,4-Q) and determined adduct levels I h after treatment, as well as mutation spectra in the H-ras gene between 6 h and 3 days after treatment. E-2-3,4-Q formed predominantly (greater than or equal to 99%) the rapidly-depurinating 4-hydroxy estradiol (4-OHE2)-1-N3Ade adduct and the slower-depurinating 4-OHE2-1-N7Gua adduct. Between 6 h and 3 days, E-2-3,4-Q induced abundant A to G mutations in H-ras DNA, frequently in the context of a 3'-G residue. Using a T.G-DNA glycosylase (TDG)-PCR assay, we determined that the early A to G mutations (6 and 12 h) were in the form of G.T heteroduplexes, suggesting misrepair at A-specific depurination sites. Since G-specific mutations were infrequent in the spectra, it appears that the slow rate of depurination of the N7Gua adducts during active repair may not generate a threshold level of G-specific abasic sites to affect repair fidelity. These results also suggest that E-2-3,4-Q, a suspected endogenous carcinogen, is a genotoxic compound and could cause mutations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available