4.7 Article

Advance optimized classification and application of surrounding rock based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and Tunnel Seismic Prediction

Journal

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
Volume 37, Issue -, Pages 217-222

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.08.019

Keywords

Tunnel Seismic Prediction (TSP); Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP); Surrounding rock classification; Advance prediction; Engineering application

Funding

  1. State Key Development Program for Basic Research of China [2013CB036000]
  2. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [51139004]
  3. State Key Laboratory for GeoMechanics and Deep Underground Engineering China University of Mining Technology [SKLGDUEK1105]
  4. Independent Innovation Foundation of Shandong University [2012TS064]
  5. Graduate Independent Innovation Foundation of Shandong University [yzc12137]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An advance optimized classification method is proposed to accurate predict the surrounding rock classification based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Tunnel Seismic Prediction (TSP). Several factors that greatly affect rock mass classification are selected as evaluation indices of FAHP based on analysis of numerous TSP data. Evaluation indices are divided into five grades according to its response characteristics of seismic wave field, and their membership functions are proposed by using frequency statistical method. Comprehensive assigning method is adopted to determine the weights of evaluation indices, and a FAHP model is established for optimized classification of surround rock. Engineering application of Shimenya Tunnel of Yi-Ba Highway is taken as a case study, and proved that the evaluation indices are easy to obtain and the evaluation results are accurate and reliable. The FAHP-TSP method can be further used for other tunnel engineering. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available