4.7 Article

Performance evaluation of ultra wideband technology for construction resource location tracking in harsh environments

Journal

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 1173-1184

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.05.001

Keywords

3D; Accuracy; Error analysis; Laser scanning; Location tracking; Ultra wideband; Robotic Total Station; RFID; Safety; Visualization

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [08000858]
  2. Construction Industry Institute (CII) [RT269]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1030472] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  6. Directorate For Engineering [0846750] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emerging wireless remote sensing technologies offer significant potential to advance the management of construction processes by providing real-time access to the locations of workers, materials, and equipment. Unfortunately, little is known regarding the accuracy, reliability, and practical benefits of an emerging technology, effectively impeding widespread adoption. This paper evaluates a commercially-available Ultra Wideband (UWB) system for real-time, mobile resource location tracking in harsh construction environments. A focus of this paper is to measure the performance of the UWB technology for tracking mobile resources in real-world construction settings. To assess tracking accuracy, location error rates for select UWB track signals are obtained by automatically tracking a single entity using a Robotic Total Station (RTS) for ground truth. Furthermore, to demonstrate the benefits of UWB technology, the paper provides case studies of resource tracking for analysis of worksite operations. The work demonstrates the applicability of UWB for the design of construction management support tools. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available