4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Life cycles, oceanography and variability: ommastrephid squid in variable oceanographic enviromnents

Journal

FISHERIES RESEARCH
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 133-143

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00378-2

Keywords

ommastrephid squid; life cycles; oceanography; variability

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exploited populations of ommastrephid squid are found under a wide range of oceanographic regimes. However, to date most scientific attention has focussed on those found in northern hemisphere western boundary current systems, and these systems have become the paradigm for theoretical work. Dosidicus gigas, in the east central-southeast Pacific, and Martialia hyadesi, in the southwest Atlantic, provide examples of the interactions between squid life cycles and regional oceanography outside of the paradigm. Illex argentinus, also in the southwest Atlantic, provides a southern hemisphere example of a western boundary current species. These examples are used to highlight the key issues involved in understanding squid population variability within the context of variable oceanographic environments. The issues include the fundamental influence of oceanographic variability on population variability, and the importance of a thorough understanding of the life cycle of the study species in order to detect and understand the relationships between it and the environment. The importance of understanding the relative temporal and spatial scales on which the environmental and biological factors interact is also considered. Overall, a broader understanding of the interactions between oceanographic variability and squid life cycles is necessary to interpret successfully the adaptation of ommastrephid squid species to their environment and to allow the effective forecasting and management of fishery resources. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science BN. Ali rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available