4.5 Article

Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use with low- and high-torque endodontic motors

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages 772-774

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200112000-00015

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the cyclic fatigue resistance of used nickel-titanium rotary instruments, clinically operated by a traditional high-torque motor and a new low-torque electric motor. Fifty instruments (ProFile, Maillefer, Baillagues, Switzerland) for each of the following sizes were used: .06-25, .06-20, and .04-25. They were divided into three groups: A = 10 new instruments (control), B = 20 used instruments operated by a high-torque motor, and C = 20 used instruments operated by a low-torque motor. Each instrument was used in 10 clinical cases (at least six molars). Cyclic fatigue testing of new and used instruments was performed with a device that allowed the instruments to rotate freely inside a stainless-steel artificial canal at 350 rpm. Data were recorded and statistically analyzed. Mean (and SD) numbers of rotation-to-breakage cycles for .06-25, .06-20, and .04-25 instruments were, respectively: group A 463 (85), 535 (101), and 613 (105); group B 229 (64), 343 (92), and 233 (84); and group C 352 (77), 454 (89), and 466 (86). Results showed that group A instruments exhibited significantly higher values of rotation-to-breakage cycles (two-sample t test, p < 0.01), when compared with groups B and C, respectively. Statistically higher resistance to cyclic fatigue was noted for group C in all sizes compared with group B (two-sample t test, p < 0.01), showing that the use of endodontic motor with lower torque values reduced cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available