4.3 Article

In vitro phagocytosis of carrier mouse red blood cells is increased by Band 3 cross-linking or diamide treatment

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages 143-149

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1042/BA20010045

Keywords

carbonic anhydrase; chemical oxidation; dialysis loading; enzyme delivery; macrophages

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemical alteration of red blood cells (RBCs) can induce increased phagocytosis of modified cells by macrophages. In this study we have used different chemical treatments for the modification of the mouse red-blood-cell membrane surface, namely oxidant compounds, such as ascorbate/Fe+2 and diamide [azodicarboxylic acid bis(dimethylamide)], or Band 3-cross-linking reagents. We monitored the phagocytosis of oxidized or Band 3-cross-linked mouse red blood cells by peritoneal macrophages. The extent of phagocytosis of RBCs is not affected by oxidation with ascorbate/Fe3+, but it is increased (up to 10%) by oxidation with 2 mM diamide. Furthermore, phagocytosis is greatly increased (up to 40%) as a result of cross-linking with either of two Band 3 bifunctional reagents [bis(sulphosuccinimidyl) suberate (BS3) and 3,3'-dithiobis(sulphosuccinimidyl propionate) (DTSSP)]. To evaluate targeting towards macrophages of such modified RBCs for therapeutical purposes, we have determined the phagocytosis of Band 3 carrier RBCs loaded with carbonic anhydrase. In this case phagocytosis is high enough (25%) to deliver the enzyme into macrophages. We have also assayed the influence of serum components and IgG on the efficiency of phagocytosis and discuss the possible phagocytosis mechanisms. In the case of BS3-cross-linked carrier RBCs, phagocytosis is markedly enhanced (from 12% up to 25%) by serum components. This opens a way for therapeutic application of these carrier RBCs, with special relevance in short-term delivery to cells of the mononuclear phagocytic system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available